The further we go down the path of the latter days, the more convoluted the differing messages in society become concerning morality and law. But the serious nature of the topic makes me want to say a few words about the it. I sincerely hope not to offend anyone, and I recognize that I am as prone to imperfection as the next person. Anyway, it helps me to wright my thoughts down, and I hope that it helps you to read them.
Many people take issue with The Church of Jesus Christ of Latter-Day Saints because from time to time the Church takes a stance on a certain politically charged topic of the day. They get angry with Mormons, or with Christians or Catholics, saying, "they are always trying to legislate their morals and beliefs on the rest of us." They feel that it is not right to force people to abide certain morals through passing laws that contain moral positions. "Who are you to tell me what morals I should have and what I can and can't do?", they say. "I get to choose what is right or wrong for me. Not you." What do you say in response to this? I can certainly understand why they might feel this way. Here are a few ideas of how I would respond.
Image from tcapologetics.org |
Laws, for the most part, all have some moral component to them. That is the nature of law. Take murder, for example; pretty easy to see the moral component there. Let's look at a less obvious example or two. How about speeding? Speeding laws exist because we have a moral obligation to try to keep people safe from harm. False advertising laws exist because we have a moral obligation not to take advantage of another person. It's not honest or fair, both of which are moral concepts. Tax evasion laws exist because we have a moral obligation to all contribute to the infrastructure that we benefit from each day. It's not fair to take advantage of those who do pay taxes by using those amenities without contributing. Again, fairness is a moral concept.
So, let's apply the "you can't legislate morality" mentality to all of these examples.
- Murder: "Why am I in jail for killing him? My belief system tells me that there is nothing wrong with killing someone that has shamed my family. You have no right to tell me what is right and wrong. That is my decision."
- Speeding: "I get to decide how fast I can go, because you can't dictate my morals to me and tell me that I should care about your safety."
- False Advertising: "Who are you to tell me I can't make false claims in my ads? I get to choose my morals, and taking advantage of someone or lying doesn't seem wrong to me; if it gets me ahead. It's survival of the fittest out there. That's natural law."
- Tax Evasion: "Why should I be punished for not paying my taxes? It's my money. I get to spend it how I want. Why should I care that you pay taxes? I never payed up for gas on road trips in college. So, why should I care about putting in now. Contributing to the group means nothing in my morality."
Some then change the subject from morality to rights. They say that these laws are all about protecting people's rights and not morality. That doesn't work either, for a few reasons. First, you can't dictate to me the moral obligation to care about your rights. Second, rights either come from the state or from God. If they come from the state, then you have no real claim over them anyway. They are on loan to you from the state and can be taken away or infringed upon at any time. If rights come from God, then they are drenched from head to toe in morality. Third, the whole concept of rights is that there are certain privileges that everyone is entitled to. And it is right for them to have those privileges and wrong to take them away. But when the concept of right and wrong enters the picture, with it comes morality.
The truth is that morality has been legislated in civilized government since forever. Legislating moral laws has never taken away people's God-given agency, just attached civil consequences to their choices. They can still choose to murder, to speed, to lie, and to freeload. And just because someone promotes a law with a certain moral foundation, it does not mean that he or she hates those that choose a different moral stance. So, the question is not, Can or should we have laws with moral foundations? but What do we as a society want our morals to be? And when the majority of society chooses morals that are contrary to "the God of the land, who is Jesus Christ," that is the day we loose the protection of Heaven (Ether 2:7-12). Thus, above all other things in our country we should be promoting and pushing for Judeo-Christian morals, for they are the only thing that keeps us free.
The truth is that morality has been legislated in civilized government since forever. Legislating moral laws has never taken away people's God-given agency, just attached civil consequences to their choices. They can still choose to murder, to speed, to lie, and to freeload. And just because someone promotes a law with a certain moral foundation, it does not mean that he or she hates those that choose a different moral stance. So, the question is not, Can or should we have laws with moral foundations? but What do we as a society want our morals to be? And when the majority of society chooses morals that are contrary to "the God of the land, who is Jesus Christ," that is the day we loose the protection of Heaven (Ether 2:7-12). Thus, above all other things in our country we should be promoting and pushing for Judeo-Christian morals, for they are the only thing that keeps us free.